《何为民主？》在线观看和下载

发人深省... 在希腊雅典，创造出的**雏形，真正由人民来统治的。demos（人民）和kratos（统治）。把城市划分区块，然后把居民随机安排到某个区，然后每个区随机抽一人来做代表。而城市的确是由随机抽到的平民来掌控管理，以确保**能够代表大家共同的利益。创意很不错。而**制度是不是一个合理的制度，仍然需要**尝试。Cornel West说得很有理，大多数的人民只是想被**，而并不想向**的方向去努力。

十年之后 Astra Taylor还是不知道自己想说什么； 虽然她的采访对象一如既往都说得相当好

Extraordinary. The whole film is shot heavily through the framework of Wendy Brown's brilliant 2016 polemic Undoing the Demos, where she argues how neoliberalism eats away demos from within. The film rightly begins and ends with Greece and uses it prominently as a **** case for how the ideals of democracy match up with its contemporary reality. Taylor is strong in exploring structures of power in the form of racial&economic domination. One conspicuous weakness is migration debate and how this issue plays into global v. local debate. Brown's "constitutive we" appears weak in her telling but Taylor barely scratches surface. Is this a ****** case of free movement of capital but not of ppl?

brattle 導演顯然是個youtuber！

作为纪录片拍的真烂。一堆采访不等于纪录片好吗？

主题定的太大却给不出相匹配的回答。看完了就是浪费生命。

“count me in the crowd of holy fools” - holy hypocrites

看了阿斯特拉·泰勒的二部片子，找了她的第三部 。除了历史观，片子找了不同的人谈谈感受，谈谈理解，开放性的讨论，充满了自我矛盾，投票大概是主要认识。历史上的城邦都很小，被****，城邦的生存空间就没有了。

The historical discussions were **** interesting than the snippets from contemporary political life. Sample bias (let alone staged acting) is always a suspicion. Even the theoretical discussion was not meant to be complete. Rousseau's "positive *******" was praised, but its implications, as those eloquently argued by Hayek and Isaiah Berlin, were not adequately discussed in the movie.

Life is a ****. Democracy too. 西方国家们也还流淌在什么是**的挣扎中。